|
|
|
Representative Clients
In recent years, the attorneys of Bose McKinney & Evans have
represented several clients in asbestos related matters. Among these
clients are the following companies:
- Anglo American South Africa Limited
- Coca-Cola Enterprises
- Davis Homes
- Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp.
- Pechiney Plastic Packaging
- PepsiCo, Inc.
- Quaker Oats
- Sargent & Lundy
- Stokley-Van Camp
- Teepak
Indiana Legal Foundation Brief
In 2002, the Indiana Legal Foundation, which monitors court
decisions having public policy implications for business, felt
compelled to write a brief on asbestos cases pending before the
Indiana Supreme Court. Bose McKinney & Evans was selected to write
the brief on behalf of the board.
With the experience of our attorneys in previous asbestos cases in
Indiana, the active participation of George Purdy on the
Foundation’s Legal Advisory Committee and the firm’s involvement in
the pending Indiana Supreme Court cases, Bose McKinney & Evans was
the natural choice to prepare the Indiana Legal Foundation brief.
Harris v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corporation
In late 1996, the attorneys of Bose McKinney & Evans
successfully obtained a favorable judgment for Owens Corning from
the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The
Seventh Circuit Court affirmed an earlier decision from a lower
court that the plaintiff had not produced sufficient evidence to
prove that the Owens Corning product had caused Harris’ illness. In
1997, Harris petitioned the Court for a rehearing, but the request
was denied.
Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Cobb
In 2001, the Bose McKinney & Evans Appellate Group obtained
a reversal by the Indiana Supreme Court of a $15.67 million judgment
against Owens Corning in favor of an individual who may have worked
with asbestos in the 1940s and 1950s. With the help of Bose McKinney
& Evans attorneys, Owens Corning appealed, and eventually the case
progressed to the Indiana Supreme Court, the first asbestos case to
do so after a jury trial. The Supreme Court reversed the judgment,
upholding Bose McKinney & Evans’ claim that the judgment did not
properly reflect that the other companies the individual worked for
had already made settlement payments to him, a fact withheld from
the jury. This omission led to the misimpression that only Owens
Corning asbestos could have caused injury.
Allied Signal, et al v. Shirley Ott
In 2003, the Indiana Supreme Court reversed the Superior
Court decision denying Allied Signal’s motion for summary judgment.
The Court determined the legislation in question was unambiguous and
the obvious meaning could not be enlarged or restricted; in other
words, the legislation holds liable those who mined and sold
asbestos.
|