|
|
|
Insurance Client Pays $35,000 Less than Last Settlement Offer
Royal Insurance was sued by a plaintiff who experienced a debilitating injury in a car
collision in 1998. Because the at-fault driver had only $100,000 in liability coverage,
the plaintiff sued for $900,000 in underinsured motorist’s coverage from his own carrier,
Royal. The plaintiff’s last demand before trial was $725,000, and the last offer before
trial was $250,000. In a jury trial, the $215,000 verdict saved Bose McKinney & Evans’
client $510,000 from the opposing party’s last settlement demand, and Royal paid $35,000
less than the settlement offered before the trial.
Jury Decides in Favor of Client in
ADA Case
Bose McKinney & Evans won a major victory for Swifty Oil Company,
Inc., in a federal jury trial. In a lawsuit alleging that an employee
(who had since died) was discharged because of his poor health, the
estate sued for $550,000, including lost wages and benefits,
compensatory and punitive damages and legal fees. During the trial,
Bose McKinney & Evans countered with evidence that Swifty Oil
based its discharge decision on legitimate non-discriminatory grounds
and promoted the employee in question even after he had a heart
attack. The jury reached a verdict in favor of Swifty Oil, agreeing
that the individual was justifiably terminated based on negligent
handling of an embezzlement scandal in three gas stations he oversaw.
$15.67 Million Judgment Reversed
The Bose McKinney & Evans Appellate Group obtained a reversal by
the Indiana Supreme Court of a $15.67 million judgment against Owens
Corning Fiberglass Corporation in favor of an individual who may have
worked with asbestos in the 1940s and 1950s. With the help of Bose
McKinney & Evans attorneys, Owens Corning appealed, and eventually
the case progressed to the Indiana Supreme Court, the first asbestos
case to do so after a jury trial. The Supreme Court reversed the
judgment, upholding Bose McKinney & Evans’ claim that the
judgment did not properly reflect that the other companies the
individual worked for had already made settlement payments to him, a
fact withheld from the jury. This omission led to the misimpression
that only Owens Corning asbestos could have caused injury.
|