|
Issue 3, July 2002
More Information about the
Intellectual Property Group
© 2002
Bose McKinney & Evans LLP
Indianapolis Downtown
2700 First Indiana Plaza
135 North Pennsylvania St.
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 684-5000
Indianapolis North
600 East 96th St., Suite 500
Indianapolis, IN 46240
Washington, D.C.
700 North One Lafayette Centre
1120 20th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
www.boselaw.com
|
SPECIAL UPDATE:
Trademarks: USPTO Says E-Filing is E-Z
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is on a mission to become an e-government agency. The recent set of
trademark rules designed to encourage electronic submission of applications and other filings, and to penalize paper
submission, is part of that plan.
In May 2002, the USPTO proposed a rule
to add a $50 surcharge whenever a person submits a paper filing instead of an electronic form available
through the USPTO’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). In a
rule effective June 23, 2002, the
USPTO removed the advantage of filing paper applications and other documents via
Express Mail (prior to the rule change, documents filed via Express Mail were considered to be filed as of the
date of mailing, not the date of receipt). Taken together, these rule changes are intended to push trademark
filers to use the TEAS e-filing system, accessible on the USPTO web site,
www.uspto.gov.
Receiving and processing electronic filings is less labor intensive than dealing with paper filings, the USPTO
claims. In addition, because the electronic data is tagged to permit direct transfer to the USPTO’s databases,
the USPTO states that electronically received information tends to be both more accurate and more quickly available
to the public.
What does this push for e-filing mean to a trademark owner? The changes resulting from these new rules
will be changes in filing procedure only; the law which gives trademark owners certain rights remains
unchanged. Depending on your experience with e-commerce and your level of computer sophistication, you
may not find the procedural changes you see to be noteworthy.
Papers you receive from your trademark attorney are likely to have a different look, because they will
be generated by the TEAS e-system. You may be asked to either affix your signature electronically
(usually by typing your name set off by slashes, as in /john smith/) to the papers or to authorize
your attorney to affix your electronic signature. You may be asked if you have the capability to e-mail
a black and white line-drawing of your logo as a “GIF” or “JPG” image. If you do not have that capability,
your attorney will need to be able transfer your paper logo drawings, as well as your labels or other
“specimens” showing how you use your trademark, to an electronic format accepted by the TEAS system.
Time will tell whether e-filing has as many advantages over paper filing as the USPTO claims.
Nevertheless, with a paper filing “penalty” on the horizon, trademark practitioners will be increasing
their use of e-filing. Just as you adapt to a changing business environment to provide your customers
with high quality services, your trademark attorneys will be incorporating e-filing into their trademark
practice to serve you better.
This is a special edition of the Intellectual Property Update, a service of Bose McKinney & Evans
LLP. The e-mail newsletter is distributed quarterly, with special
updates distributed as news develops, in
an effort to bring our clients up-to-date on the latest information in patent, trademark, and copyright law.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding your
intellectual property matters, please contact us.
|