|
Issue 1, May 2002
More Information about the
Real Estate Group
Contact
Us
Philip Nicely
Jim Carlino
Natalie Stucky
Tammy Haney
John Smeltzer
Harry Todd
Tag Birge
Mary Beth Browne
Steve Granner
Michelle Ferguson
Cheryl Saalfrank
© 2002
Bose McKinney & Evans LLP
Indianapolis North
600 East 96th St., Suite 500
Indianapolis, IN 46240
(317) 574-3700
Indianapolis Downtown
2700 First Indiana Plaza
135 North Pennsylvania St.
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Washington, D.C.
700 North One Lafayette Centre, Suite N700
1120 20th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
www.boselaw.com
|
Impact Fees – New Deduction Ruling
Like many states, Indiana adopted “impact fee” legislation several years ago. Impact fees are simply fees that
can be imposed by local government to help offset the impact of new development on a community. Until recently
the Internal Revenue Service treated impact fees assessed by local governments as non-deductible land costs.
On February 15, 2002, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2002-9 which provides that impact fees, incurred by a taxpayer
in connection with the construction of a new residential rental building, should be treated as capitalized costs
allocable to the building. The impact fees are considered indirect costs, rather than land costs, because they
are incurred by reason of and directly benefit the taxpayer’s production activity. The result of this ruling is
that a taxpayer can depreciate the impact fees over the useful life of the buildings. This ruling changes the
IRS’s prior position that prevented taxpayers from depreciating impact fees.
For more information about how this ruling may affect your business, please contact
a member of the Real Estate Group.
U.S. Supreme Court Deals with Regulatory Taking Issue at Lake Tahoe
On April 23rd, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its
long-awaited opinion in the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency case. This was a “regulatory taking” case involving a question of whether a government agency would need to compensate certain property owners for the loss of use of their property resulting from the imposition of a “temporary” moratorium on construction surrounding Lake Tahoe.
In the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency case, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the construction moratorium did not constitute a regulatory taking under either the “deprivation of all economically beneficial use” test or under the “balancing” test.
Given the important public interest in clean water, the temporary nature
of the moratorium and the fact that the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
worked diligently during the moratorium to address this public
interest, the court found that no taking had occurred. As a
result, no compensation was due.
FULL STORY
New Attorney Joins Real Estate
Group
Harry Todd joined the Bose McKinney & Evans Real Estate
Group as a partner. Harry has more than 18 years of experience, working
both in private practice and as general counsel for private
corporations. Most recently, he worked for Gibraltar Properties, Inc., a real estate acquisition and development company that owns and manages office buildings, retail centers and apartment complexes.
|