|
|
||
|
More Information about the Health Law Group |
October 2006 | |
|
Contact Us:
© 2006 and
600 East 96th Street, Suite 500 Northwest
Indiana and 3577 West Lakeshore Drive Raleigh
West
Lafayette |
Current News and Issues FTC Charges IPAs with Price Fixing The Federal Trade
Commission asserted that two Independent Practice Associations engaged
in a price-fixing scheme when they and individual physician members
refused to deal with health care plans except on capitated pricing terms
agreed to by the IPA even though individual members otherwise competed
against one another for physician services provided on a fee-for-service
basis. The price-fixing and refusals to deal violated Section 5 of the
FTC Act according to the FTC's Complaint and Proposed Consent Order.
"Failure-to-Warn" Claims Against Pfizer Pre-empted by FDC Act; Deceptive Advertising Claims Go Forward A federal court
for the Northern District of California decided that state law failure-to-warn
claims were pre-empted because they conflict with FDA's drug labeling
regulations. The court gave deference to the agency's pre-emption position
included in a final rule on drug labeling earlier this year. However,
the court found that FDA had not taken a similar position on drug advertising,
leaving intact state claims alleging false or deceptive advertising.
FDA Issues Draft Guidance on Regulation of IVD Multivariate Index Assays The Food and Drug
Administration published a draft guidance outlining the Agency's proposed
oversight of In Vitro Diagnostic Multivariate Index Assays (IVDMIA).
These products use a combination of in vitro assays and demographic
data to produce patient specific variables which are then integrated
into complex, software driven algorithms that yield patient specific
assessment or predictive conclusions such as the likelihood of recurrence
of a cancer or the need for chemotherapy. FDA proposes to treat IVDMIAs
as Class II or Class III medical devices, based on an assessment of
risk, thus requiring either a 510(k) premarket notification or a PMA.
AHIP Argues That Lack of Interoperability in Health Information Technology Presents Antitrust Risks AHIP (America's Health Insurance Plans) commissioned a legal opinion on the anti-competitive effects of proposed federal legislation that would remove the interoperability requirement from the recently enacted exceptions to the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Stark physician self-referral law for electronic health records and e-prescribing technology. The legal memorandum asserts that dominant market participants may be able to exclude competition in violation of federal anti-trust laws by providing proprietary (non-interoperative) systems to health care providers who admit patients to the dominant hospital. House and Senate conferees have been at odds over the interoperability issue and no resolution is expected before a lame duck session of Congress after the November elections.
Voluntary Dismissal of Malpractice Complaint Before Department of Insurance Constitutes Dismissal with Prejudice A patient, who gave
notice to the Indiana Department of Insurance voluntarily withdrawing
her complaint of malpractice, even though she asked that her file remain
open, was foreclosed from later pursuing her case. The patient's "open
and voluntary renunciation" was deemed to be a retraxit by the
Court, which operated as a dismissal with prejudice.
| |
|
This Update, a service of Bose McKinney & Evans, provides information on the issues
that affect your business. For more information about the materials presented, contact your primary Bose McKinney
& Evans attorney,
or email us comments.
The information in this Update should not be construed as legal advice. To unsubscribe click here and type "unsubscribe" in the subject box. |
||